protocol: (► recreation and forestry)
WASHINGTON. ([personal profile] protocol) wrote in [community profile] forbarrayar 2017-05-07 04:43 pm (UTC)

[ Hm. He does stop there, not to avoid the question, but to honestly consider his answer. It does bother him on some levels, but not at all in others. Wash above all else has always been remarkably cognizant of some of the more awful sides of him. He's accepted it. He knows what he is.

But of course, if he'd entirely accepted it, if he'd entirely embraced it, he wouldn't keep himself as leashed as he does. Byerly was right, on that one. ]


Yes.

[ But maybe not as much as he thinks it should bother him. Another problem all on it's own. The vagueness of Byerly's answer does make him think there's some technicality he's hinging on, Wash wants to try and find it. A stab in the dark; ]

Whatever you did, you don't think you should've been disowned. [ Or he did. Either way it's information. ]

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting